Understanding strike and dip on geologic maps

In order to understand geology, we need to think about the rocks below our feet in three dimensions. Those spatial relationships— what’s on top of what, how rocks are faulted or folded— give us all kinds of interesting information. While maps are useful in all kinds of ways, they’re a little lacking in the 3-D department. So when we’ve measured the orientation of a rock layer, we need a way to represent that on a map. Here’s a basic primer on how that’s done.

The geological lingo for this is “strike and dip”. The words may be confusing at first, but it’s really quite simple. Let’s start with some nice, horizontal sedimentary rocks. Pretend the top of this block is the surface of the Earth. Picture a kangaroo hopping across it, if that helps or entertains you.

strikedip1

Let’s picture a single layer of that rock and tilt it downward to the right. The tilt of that layer is what we call “dip”. We describe this layer as dipping to the right, because that’s the direction it’s tilted downwards toward. We measure the dip as the angle between the layer and horizontal.

strikedip3

Now, let’s try to imagine looking at that same tilted layer from directly above it. Again, it’s dipping downward to the right. Draw a horizontal line across that layer— that’s what we call the “strike”. (Don’t worry about why we use that word.) In this example, the strike is north-south. That means this layer is dipping to the east.

strikedip4

Here’s a block made of tilted layers instead of horizontal ones. The top of the block is still the surface of the Earth, but I’ve sliced out a piece of the block to help us visualize this better. Imagine you’re looking at a cliff.

strikedip2

When you look at the side of the block, you can see the dip. When you look at the top of the block (the surface), you can see the strike. Click the image below to explore a real outcrop of sandstone and siltstone from the Oregon coast that looks a lot like this. Be sure to zoom in and get a closer look.

SunsetBayGigaEmbed

Here’s an annotated image of that outcrop, just to make sure you can see the strike and dip. You can click on this image to see more photos from this spot. If you click this link, you can check out  the area with Google Earth.

13053778383_64db508ea3_z

Geologists carefully measure the strike and dip on an outcrop like that using a tool called a Brunton compass, pictured below.

Wikimedia Commons

Once you’ve made the measurements, you can display them on a geologic map— which was our goal at the start of this post. Strike is easy enough, since it’s a compass direction. If we measured the rock striking north-south, we would draw a short, vertical line on the map in the location of our measurement (assuming up is north). If the rock was dipping 45 degrees to the east, we would add a tick mark at the midpoint of  our strike line, pointing east. Think of the tick mark as an arrow pointing in the direction a ball would roll if you could set it on that rock layer. Just below that we would write the measured dip: “45”. It would look something like the example below. The different colors on the map represent the different rock layers exposed at the surface, just like looking at one of the block diagrams from above. Without the strike and dip symbol, we would have no idea if those layers were dipping to the west, to the east, or were vertical. But by adding this simple symbol, we can understand something about the 3-D orientation of the rocks.

strikedip5

Hat tip to Lockwood DeWitt for giving me the idea for this post.

Advertisements

Groundwater Contamination Activity

Another classroom activity, this one using a scenario of investigating groundwater contamination at a gas station to reinforce some basic concepts about hydraulic head and groundwater flow. It’s based on a lab by Karen Kortz at CCRI which I stumbled across on the SERC website. I expanded the grid a bit, put together a slick spreadsheet that can be used to recall the data efficiently, shortened it up to take up a little less class time, and added a few questions related to real-world site investigations. It’s probably appropriate for any intro-level class that discusses groundwater, be that high school or college.

It goes like this: student groups select three locations to drill monitoring wells at a gas station where underground storage tanks were found to have leaked. I tap the locations into the spreadsheet (i.e. K7, M22, Q13) and it brings up the head in the well and the concentration of benzene in a sample from the well. They work out flow direction and then get to pick three final monitoring wells. After that, they’ve got to make a best guess of flow direction and contamination extent, and think about risks to surrounding homes. If you can, it’s great to show them a map (or some examples) of contaminated sites in your site after this. (Here’s Wisconsin’s, for example.)

Feel free to use/adapt. Ideas to extend or improve the activity are also welcome.

Activity_GroundwaterContamination (Word doc)
Activity_GroundwaterContamination (PDF)
Activity_GroundwaterContamination (Excel spreadsheet)

First sheet of spreadsheet is data lookup form to use in class. Second sheet shows head gradient (slightly distorted geometrically), and third shows benzene concentrations. One interesting thing to do is compare estimates from different groups to “reality” to demonstrate how imperfect interpretations from real-world data are.

gw_contam_map