Due to the incredible (and continuing) response in the comments on my post about Guy McPherson, I’m creating a fresh thread for general discussions or questions about climate here. Any comments specific to the Guy McPherson post can continue there.
In order to understand geology, we need to think about the rocks below our feet in three dimensions. Those spatial relationships— what’s on top of what, how rocks are faulted or folded— give us all kinds of interesting information. While maps are useful in all kinds of ways, they’re a little lacking in the 3-D … Continue reading
Recently, a few Ars Technica commenters have been posting references to the work of Guy McPherson on climate articles. McPherson is a retired professor of ecology at the University of Arizona, and he runs a blog called Nature Bats Last. In recent years, he has turned his energies to dire warnings of impending climate catastrophe. Those warnings go … Continue reading
Update: For another take on this, check out this great article by John Timmer. In last night’s debate between Bill Nye and Kentucky’s Creation Museum founder Ken Ham, Ham focused on a favorite argument of his. Ham thinks all of science can be neatly divided into two types: observational (or experimental) science, and historical science. … Continue reading
The following thoughts are hopefully instructively wrong. The idea that science communication inherently occurs via two channels– meaning and content– strikes me as one of the most useful ways of thinking about it. The content entails the information, be it news of a fresh study or an explanation of some concept, and the meaning is … Continue reading
This is a little experiment in adding some humor to the week’s science news. In the spirit of empiricism, some jokes may be placebos. Feel free to submit data so I can revise my hypothesis. Eau de Toilette First up, great medical news: researchers have built a machine that can “smell” bladder cancer from a … Continue reading